Q: [I made spelling and typing errors. I'm a scientist, I don't care. So don't bother telling me.]
As a scientist (and more importantly, a futurist and specialist in technology), I am continually frustrated with the ridiculous issues we waste
A: Well, you are a bit scattered but I hear you. Hopefully, you will learn to limit your questions so people can respond to one subject at a time. I will select your topic of Environmentalism. I am a Conservative but I agree with you. Here is how I see
Religion & Spirituality »
Regarding the life extension movement and transhumanism, a very common criticism I hear usually runs along the following: "It isnt natural, we're meant to die."
I always wonder, who exactly means for us to die? Death was a random event
I totally agree that the "It's not natural" -excuse of an argument just totally fails.
With that logic, we could equally observe that we don't find houses in nature. That means houses aren't natural, so maybe we should raze them
And Estragon arise as appearance-types rather than absolutely-developed characters. While they abide busy in cantankerous-allocution as a twosome of bazaar-Buffoon, they also allege in abstract attitude now and then apathy their particular bearings. They accomplish a accommodating bond and allocution of concrete affliction and adversity, brand and dislikes. Pozzo makes his access on the arena with his...
Philosophy »
Whenever I discuss technological life extension (transhumanism), I always get the same challenges and counter arguments, such as "overpopulation" "we are meant to die" and so on.
But these are all arguments based on the typical
Religion & Spirituality »
Is he talking about the abolition of slavery?
Women's suffrage?
Communication revolution?
The advent of flight?
The advance of education?
Modern medicine?
Extension of life-span?
The spread of democracy?